Movie Review: The Wind That Shakes the Barley


“If they bring their savagery over here, we will meet it with a savagery of our own,” declares an IRA commander to his troops in The Wind That Shakes the Barley (2006). In director Ken Loach’s film about the Irish War of Independence, the British leave but the savagery remains and is channeled literally brother against brother in the Irish Civil War.

The movie is told from the perspective of Damien O’Donovan (Cillian Murphy), a young medical student from rural Cork who tries to avoid the war even though his brother Teddy (Padraic Delaney) is a leader of the local cell of the IRA. After witnessing acts of brutality by the Black and Tans, he joins up and over the course of the film becomes more and more radical. At the point where the Anglo-Irish Treaty is signed, Damien opposes the treaty as surrendering to fear while Teddy supports the Irish Free State as a way towards peace. The ensuing tragedy is inevitable but still harrowing to watch.

This movie contrasts beautiful cinematography with horrifying scenes of violence and torture. It incorporates a lot of the history, debate, and nuance of the rebellion in a non-didactic manner. As opposed to the Neil Jordan’s Michael Collins (1996) great-man approach, this film takes the view of the common people. This film also goes beyond the Anglo-Irish conflict to take on issues of the class conflict. Are they rebelling to merely throw off British rule or to liberate the poor from their wealthy oppressors as well? Loach includes an element of Irish socialism inspired by James Connelly in the character of the railroad driver Dan (Liam Cunningham). The Wind That Shakes the Barley also recognizes the role of women in the rebellion, from the elderly women who feed and cover the IRA troops to the young woman Sinead (Orla Fitzgerald) who is actively involved in shaping the new nation.

Having the advantage of hindsight, I find it hard to sympathize with the Anti-Treaty Republicans. While the treaty was not ideal, it was a stepping stone as Michael Collins pointed out. The years of violence and death that occurred in the war over the treaty seem so unnecessary in light of what was to come. The opposition would eventually take power in the Dáil Éireann (by simply refusing to take the oath to the British king) and in a few more years would have a constitution for Ireland and full independence. On the other hand, some points raised in the film are also true. The poor in Ireland suffered some of the most terrible poverty in Western Europe for at least the first 50 years of independent Ireland and of course the partition of Northern Ireland still stands.

Your comments are welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.