Welcome to the Panorama of the Mountains Blogging A to Z Challenge. This year I’m watching and reviewing movies from A-to-Z based on my ongoing Classic Movie Project. Most movies will be featured on one or more of three lists: AFI’s 100 Years…100 Movies (USA), The Sight & Sound Greatest Films of All Time (UK), and Cahiers du Cinéma Greatest Films of All Time (France). In some cases, I will be very creative in assigning a Classic Movie to a letter of the alphabet, and in a few cases the movie I watch will not be Classic Movies at all.
Title: A Clockwork Orange
Release Date: December 19, 1971
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Production Company: Polaris Films | Hawk Films
Summary/Review:
I first saw this movie as a freshman in college 30 years ago, when A Clockwork Orange was having a 20th anniversary revival at the local arthouse theatre. It seemed like a strange, retro-future film but oddly compelling at the time. Watching it today, I find it harder to believe that this movie was even made 50 years ago. Knowing that up to the mid-60s movies were censored and cut for anodyne things and then in 1971, there is this. The first 15 minutes especially seem purposefully designed to put up the most vicious depictions of violent assault and rape and dare the audience not to turn away.
It occurs to me on this viewing that A Clockwork Orange is a very right-wing movie. The movie draws on that era’s obsession with law and order (that persists to this day). Alex (Malcolm McDowell) is depicted as a criminal youth who would later be described as a “superpredator.” Right wingers love to blame parents for their failure to raise children right, and Alex’s parents here are seen as completely checked out. The government is also at fault. Alex’s social worker, Mr. Deltoid (Aubrey Morris), is ineffective and probably homosexual. Politicians are uniformly corrupt and self-interested. The one person initially sympathetic to Alex’s mistreatment, Mr. Alexander (Patrick Magee), is a liberal who only wants to use Alex to achieve his own political goals. And following the right-wing saying “a conservative is a liberal who has been mugged,” Alexander immediately shifts to revenge when he learns that Alex raped his wife.
The movie succeeds a lot on its style. The sets, costumes, music, and cinematography are all excellent. McDowell brings a devious charm to his acting that makes the audience sympathetic to Alex in the same way the politicians are ultimately won over. I don’t think it succeeds as well in getting its message across, which I think it does in overly simplistic and contradictory ways. Kubrick seems to believe that everyone has an Alex inside of them. Based on the stories of what Kubrick did to his actors and crew while filming this and other movies, I believe he was correct in diagnosing his inner Alex, but then projected that onto all of humanity.
I have mixed feelings about this movie. I can’t recommend it based on its extreme levels of violence and misogyny. But I also can’t deny that it is an important movie in film history, and brings up important issues to discuss (even if they may not be the issues the film creator intended).
Rating: ***
Panorama of the Mountains 
I know it’s an important film (and book, too), but I was unable to watch it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t blame you.
LikeLike
I watched this a long, LONG time ago when I was a 14 year old kid which was certainly something I should not be watching, but I had stayed up past my bed time and I was intrigued at the scenes where Alex had eye clamps and was fastened on the chair. I wonder if I’d think of it as a right-wing film, if I were to watch it now, though certainly if memory serves correctly I thought it was absolutely terrifying. Thank you for sharing your thoughts!
For our A-Z we wrote on criticism: https://sasiety.co.uk/a-z-challenge-c-criticism/
Have a lovely Saturday! :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I watched some really inappropriate movies when I was 14, and younger!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m a big fan of Kubrick movies. You know this movie is based on a novel, yes? What you may not know is that the book was censored in the US and the last part was left off. If you care to read the uncensored version you can find it out there now.
I see, “A Clockwork Orange,” as satirical, which is a distortion and exaggeration of reality to make a point. The author and Kubrick make a point here in many ways. The subjugation of the population by overlords will always have those who resist that subjugation. Don’t you see the irony of the examples used? The same rapists later become cops. Alex becomes a guinea pig for hair-brained attempts to reprogram him, but what they do is extinguish the one piece of goodness that was in him. And then when it backfires on them, the government is supporting this guy for the rest of his life.
I love this movie (and the book, which is written in a fascinating lingo) and agree it is shocking but it is shocking with purpose. I’m going to be doing a review of Oliver Stone’s film, “Natural Born Killers,” which is also ultra-violent — but for the same reason as, “A Clockwork Orange” is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with everything you say about what this movie is trying to say, but also feel it missed the mark.
One interesting thing I learned about the Anthony Burgess novel while working on this post is that Kubrick got a copy of the original version during production but decided to stick with the shortened US version as the source material
LikeLiked by 1 person
By the way here are some quick thoughts on the movies I’ve seen from the Kubrick oeuvre:
LikeLike
We’ll have to disagree on the first part, and I agree, Kubrick diverged from the plot of the novel. You will probably want to skip my NBK review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great choice, and so iconic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have actually never seen A Clockwork Orange and I think I’m okay with that. Weekends In Maine
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hard to believe how old this film is! It certainly divided opinion. I can’t say I’d want to watch it again.
LikeLiked by 1 person